"We are humans devoured by nothingness" - Bukowski
Mark Manson, in his book The Subtle Art of Not Giving a Fck*, specifically in Chapter Nine titled "And Then You Die," discusses the terror of death that has settled into the hearts of humans, unlike other creatures. He references previous works by other authors, most notably Ernest Becker's The Denial of Death, where Becker states: “Wars, revolutions, and mass killings occur when one group's immortality project collides with another group’s immortality project. The shedding of millions of lives is justified as defense of one group’s immortality project against that of another group. When immortality projects fail, when meaning weakens, and when the terror of death looms, we experience severe anxiety leading to depression, consuming our minds. Instead of pursuing those projects through sheer force, people often question their imagined selves and attempt to accept the reality of their inevitable death. Becker calls this 'the bitter antidote.’"
The ideas put forth by Manson and his references to previous works revolve around a fundamental concept: the fear of death. Humans are the only beings that can imagine what happens after death, and this fear has become the main driver of everything humanity has built throughout the history of the planet, spanning all intellectual, religious, political, and architectural endeavors. From temples, cemeteries, sports arenas, libraries, gardens, walls, and towers, some of which have become wonders of the world, to attempts to destroy or conquer them by other groups seeking to establish their own alternative immortality projects that negate the existence of others. This conflict will likely continue until the cycle of human life on this planet comes to an end, unless humanity finds a way to control its ongoing disputes through intellectual and moral approaches.
In the eastern part of this planet, the stage has been the most crowded with such events, being the most abundant and diverse in immortality projects, which are largely connected to metaphysics, beyond the limits of human reasoning. These metaphysical concepts are sanctified and deeply rooted, to the point where entire civilizations have become possessed by these projects, with these imagined selves becoming an integral part of their identity. These beliefs were passed down by the messengers of their gods, and bloodshed has flowed on this earth for thousands of years. The residents of the western part of the planet, who were also influenced by the ideas of these messengers, intervened in bloody campaigns to destroy the immortality projects of certain groups of people in favor of others. This cycle has continued ever since.
The leaders of these immortality projects have rarely given themselves the chance to consider a critical question: Could their god, who sent them messages through his messengers, truly incite them to kill other humans, destroy civilizations, and deprive people of the right to life, even though he is also their creator? Logic and reason would suggest that sacredness and creation should be far above inciting violence. Unless, of course, it stems from their myths that each group has its own god, who grants his chosen people exclusive rights to geography, history, and sets boundaries between them and others, while denying the rights of others.
In a piece of land within the geography of the East, no larger than 27,000 square kilometers according to the Sykes-Picot divisions and the will of the Western immortality project, victorious over the Ottoman immortality project in World War I (a war that cost millions of lives), there have already been dozens of competing immortality projects for thousands of years. This land is burdened with the messages sent by the gods to humanity, transitioning from polytheism to monotheism, with figures like Moses, Jesus, David, Solomon, and Muhammad, among others. This land is intricately linked to them, a strange blend of historical facts and oral traditions passed down from generation to generation, which have, over time and through various interpretations, turned into myths that no sound human mind can fully accept. Especially now, with all the advancements in historical, archaeological, and informational research, it has become clear that the civilizations and ideas that have emerged from this land since the dawn of history are simply reproductions of one another, with only slight variations intended to distinguish them according to the developments of each era.
In the heat of conflict, with its inherent immortality projects that have dominated this geographical region, the seeds of violent disputes have been sown, the latest of which is the ongoing struggle of nearly a century between two immortality projects representing two groups of people. This conflict, recently softened by calling it the “Israeli-Palestinian conflict,” aligns with contemporary discourse, masking the reality that, at its core, it is a Torah-based immortality project. This project, with its ideological, theoretical, and pragmatic alliances, draws from historical facts and oral traditions to deny the other’s connection to time and place. On the other hand, there is the Arab-Islamic immortality project, which similarly draws from historical facts and oral traditions to negate the other. Nothing demonstrates this more clearly than the quick invocation of religious terminology and the reversion to sacred texts when it comes to mobilizing people during times of need, fueling the conflict through a long series of events, from sacred scriptures filled with incitement to shed blood, to popular tales, historical narratives, educational curriculums, and the manipulation of place names, all intended to wage waves of violence and death.
From Al-Aqsa Mosque to the Temple Mount, from the Western Wall to the Wailing Wall, from the West Bank to Judea and Samaria, between every lull in the fighting, accusations are exchanged that the other side’s educational curriculum is to blame for inciting conflict, as if one side is innocent of what they accuse the other. They both harbor deep-rooted notions of racial superiority and denial of the other, extending into every facet of life. This struggle is unlikely to end, even as both sides' so-called immortality projects continue to train their populations in bending history and twisting the truth to serve their respective narratives and traditions.
After more than four decades since the 1948 Nakba and over two decades since the 1967 Naksa, following bloody rounds of violence and during a popular uprising in the early 1990s, after more than three years of an inflamed Intifada, and amidst a second Gulf War after Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait, which ended in disaster, the Arab immortality project was permanently shattered. At the same time, the Palestinian leadership aligned with Iraq, suffering heavy losses, and both sides of the primary conflict needed a break from the bloodshed. This led to an invitation for a ceasefire from then U.S. President George H. W. Bush and a peace conference in Madrid, despite the incomplete Palestinian representation with a joint Jordanian-Palestinian delegation. Meanwhile, the Israeli leadership, under the notorious hardliner Yitzhak Shamir, who famously declared, “I will negotiate with them for twenty years and give them nothing,” stalled any real progress, in line with his denial of the other’s existence.
The 1992 elections quickly brought to power one of the generals of the Biblical immortality project, Yitzhak Rabin, who was more pragmatic than his predecessor. Having experienced the meaning of conflict and its tragedies, Rabin preferred to move forward on the Syrian negotiation track, following the military logic of addressing the most dangerous threat. However, his partner in government, Shimon Peres, held a different view, following the political logic of addressing the root of the conflict. Peres led a secret track with his sworn enemy, the PLO, in Oslo, the freezing capital of Norway. There, under political necessity and far from the media, an agreement to declare principles was hastily reached. This agreement, named after Oslo, was signed in the White House to give it importance and momentum. Despite its flaws, this cold agreement sowed seeds of hope for two peoples who had been scorched by their respective immortality projects. It was agreed that the final status issues (Jerusalem, refugees, borders, the state) would be postponed for five years, with the idea of moving beyond the complexities of the immortality projects to embrace the reality of international law and the vision of two neighboring states, even if unequally divided, with a 78%-22% split based on international legitimacy.
Yasser Arafat, the leader of the national immortality project, entered Gaza in 1994, carrying this newborn hope. One of the unwritten conditions for success was the sincerity of intentions during implementation. However, in order to appease the majority on both sides — those still living in the dream of their respective immortality projects, "from the Nile to the Euphrates" on one side, and exclusive Islamic ownership of the land on the other — the leaders of the cold agreement began to leak that what had been signed was nothing more than an expanded form of autonomy for the people, not the land. They called it a "state" or "empire" as they wished. On the other hand, it was presented as a necessity, recalling the Hudaybiyyah Agreement from Islamic history (the Prophet’s treaty with the polytheists of Mecca). But both sides knew that what had been signed was neither autonomy nor Hudaybiyyah. The inability of the masses to swallow the bitter cure all at once required a gradual approach, with hopes that calm, openness, coexistence, economic prosperity, peace, and the release of freedoms would gradually lead both sides to recognize their shared humanity. Eventually, it was hoped they would accept two separate, neighboring entities, complementing one another at all levels in this region.
Leaders of the religious wing of the immortality projects and their allies on both sides, operating outside official institutions, soon woke up from their magical paradise and attempted to cut off the life-giving oxygen, sustained by blood, destruction, tears, and a culture of mourning. One graduate of the Biblical immortality institutes assassinated Rabin, driven by incitement from the hardcore of the Biblical immortality project. This ignited a wave of settlement expansion and provocations at holy sites. Meanwhile, the other side's religious immortality project responded with equally fierce campaigns of incitement, accusations of heresy, and clashes. Several internal confrontations ensued, prisons filled, and the religious immortality project leaders, particularly those from the Muslim Brotherhood, unleashed waves of violence to drive the other side to despair, undermining any progress in the cold agreement’s implementation.
In the face of mounting obstacles, Benjamin Netanyahu rose to power in 1996, one of the fiercest opponents of the cold agreement and a player in the Biblical immortality project, as detailed in his book A Place Among the Nations. With personal experiences, including his brother’s death in an operation tied to the Biblical immortality project, Netanyahu executed the bare minimum of the cold agreement's terms over three years, creating enough bloodshed and obstacles to fuel public distrust in the peace process.
As the five-year period of the cold agreement approached its end, Ehud Barak, one of the most pragmatic of Israel’s generals, took power in 1999. His military experience gave him a deep understanding of war. U.S. President Bill Clinton reopened the Camp David summit, and along with his Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, pushed negotiations forward. However, despite the pressure, the magic of Camp David could not solve the deepest obstacles, especially the core issue of Jerusalem. Jerusalem's complexity, being both the site of Prophet Muhammad’s night journey and the location of the Dome of the Rock, a key Islamic site, as well as the Temple Mount for the Jews, became an unsolvable knot.
Then, in a provocative move, General Ariel Sharon, architect of several massacres, stormed the Al-Aqsa Mosque compound with armed forces. This led to the outbreak of a second Intifada, which caused the deaths of thousands on both sides, destruction of infrastructure, and further entrenched the two immortality projects. Sharon eventually rose to power, maintaining a grip on both the political and violent threads of the conflict. During this period, Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat was effectively sidelined through mysterious circumstances, including possible poisoning.
Despite the collapse of many efforts, Mahmoud Abbas, Arafat’s long-time partner and an advocate of the cold agreement, took over the leadership. Abbas, a pragmatic leader known for his credibility, struggled with maintaining popular support, as he rejected the use of violence and sought to navigate the failures of the immortality projects through political dialogue. The situation worsened when, in 2006, elections brought the Brotherhood’s version of the immortality project into power in Gaza. This deepened the internal divide, creating an unstable political and security environment, marked by violence and bloodshed between the national and religious wings of the Palestinian cause.
In this chaotic environment, the Gaza takeover by the Brotherhood forces, aligned with their religious vision, resulted in the dismantling of the national project in Gaza. Attempts to reconcile the divide failed, and the region was left in a state of violent conflict, as both sides of the immortality projects clung to their visions, refusing any meaningful compromise.
Amid this scene, international efforts are underway to salvage what can be saved from the "Project of Frost" after gathering what remains of the "Project of Immortality" in its national form. This is happening under the government of "Torahic Immortality" led by one of the pillars of the project, who previously headed Jerusalem’s municipality and actively worked to erase the city’s identity during his tenure. Now, after having achieved his aims, he has stepped into the political world with its pragmatic requirements. Together with his Palestinian counterpart, a seasoned politician familiar with the internal dynamics of both sides, they began drafting broad outlines for a final agreement. However, the decision to proceed was obstructed by an assessment suggesting that reaching an agreement with someone facing judicial charges of bribery and corruption would be doomed to fail. It was deemed in the higher interest to wait, hoping that the successor to the "Torahic Immortality" project would be the graceful Tzipi Livni, heir to the Kadima Party and a former Mossad operative—an arm of the "Torahic Immortality" project. But political calculations do not always align with reality.
In 2009, Benjamin Netanyahu, the "King of Political Deception," re-emerged, taking us back to square one: one step forward, two steps back. The other side in the conflict decided that, in order to preserve what remained of the "Immortality Project," they must push towards internationalizing the conflict, as bilateral solutions seemed impossible. They sought new international legitimacies and headed to global courts to exert more pressure on the "Torahic Immortality" project, which skillfully manipulated democracy and the transfer of power to evade commitments. The vacuum created by this, however, demanded ongoing efforts to reconnect the threads of national unity, renewing hope among the people despite the knowledge that the outcome was already clear to those familiar with the origins of this entrenched conflict, rooted in the sharp contrast between a project grounded in political realism and one indulging in delusions.
Widespread unrest in several Arab countries, dubbed the "Arab Spring" and marked by the rise of the Muslim Brotherhood, along with the Arab system’s preoccupation with dealing with these repercussions, shifted focus away from their primary immortality project. Meanwhile, under the Democratic leadership of Barack Obama, the U.S. engaged both publicly and secretly with these developments. Yet, this administration received no cooperation from Netanyahu, who openly opposed them, particularly regarding the agreement to contain Iran’s nuclear program. Netanyahu believed that prolonging the conflict with Iran was necessary to secure the victory of his immortality project rather than merely containing it.
In the midst of international ambiguity, amid accusations of foreign interference in the U.S. elections by the deep state’s arch-enemy Vladimir Putin, Donald Trump—a business tycoon and showman—unexpectedly ascended to power. Backed by the evangelical "Immortality Project," which allied with the "Torahic Immortality Project" and endorsed it without reservation, Trump provided Netanyahu with a kindred spirit in the art of political, financial, and moral deception. Coming from outside the bureaucratic establishment, Trump’s political vision was shaped by a simple equation: history, land, and global leadership equate to how much money one can earn. At this moment, Netanyahu coined new terms like "diplomatic terrorism" to add to his earlier assertions that there was no Palestinian partner and that the weak Palestinian Authority could not control the lands handed over to it. He conveniently ignored that his policies were designed to weaken the Authority, all while using the polls to support the Muslim Brotherhood’s immortality project.
Without warning, Trump moved the U.S. embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, a project long delayed by the deep state in the halls of Congress. He also recognized the annexation of the Golan Heights by the "Torahic Immortality State," drew up final status solutions in what he called the "Deal of the Century," but in reality, it was a patchwork of isolated islands divided by forests, tunnels, and Torahic Immortality settlements. He presented this plan to a people who have suffered for over a century as the final solution, treating it as a personal real estate deal. He ignored international law, U.N. resolutions, and intensified the firestorm he had ignited, pulling certain nations into agreements with the descendants of Isaac, a move meant to unite the descendants of Abraham despite the historical divisions between the sons of Sarah and Hagar.
As 2020 drew to a close, the Palestinian scene breathed a sigh of relief with the fall of Donald Trump and the arrival of Joe Biden, a veteran Democrat in politics and self-proclaimed Zionist. While not a better alternative from a Palestinian perspective, Biden’s ascension was seen as an improvement simply because no one worse than Trump had ever held the office in contemporary history. The Palestinian situation, however, was left to pick up the pieces after Trump’s four turbulent years and Netanyahu’s refusal to allow Jerusalemites to participate in national elections. Meanwhile, the de facto rulers of the "Brotherhood Immortality" project in Gaza continued their cycle of futile wars, amassing weapons and recruiting thousands of jobless young men from refugee camps, preparing for their sacred jihad.
Thus, under an unspoken agreement between all conflicting powers and interests—from the "Torahic Immortality" rulers to the Persian, Wahhabi, and Ottoman immortality projects—each pursued its own goals. Yet, these objectives converged at a single point: the stability of the "Brotherhood Immortality" statelet. For Netanyahu, the equation was clear: the flow of funds to the Brotherhood ensured their economic self-sufficiency, thereby entrenching the division and liberating them from the political pressures of mere survival. This, in turn, reinforced Netanyahu's global narrative that there was no legitimate Palestinian partner, blocking any progress towards peace.
As for the Persian Immortality Project, the Brotherhood statelet was a critical distraction for the U.S. in one of its most strategic areas of influence, while the Wahhabi Immortality Project played its role in containing the Brotherhood, hoping to bring about stability in the vicinity of the Torahic state. Meanwhile, Egypt’s military regime traded its silence for smuggling concessions into Gaza. And the Ottomans, chasing after their imperial dreams, saw the Brotherhood as their most vital tool in regaining influence over the Arab and Muslim world's foremost cause.
Thus, the Brotherhood’s leaders, protected by those seeking security and influence, grew stronger, while the majority of their people continued to struggle in poverty and unemployment.
You can't help but feel like you're experiencing symptoms of paranoia as you listen and read about the surprise of October 7th. Even the most basic security analysis skills, taught to any beginner analyst for creating both general and immediate situation assessments, would put an end to this underestimation of people's intellect. In the language of security and analytical logic, several questions should have been raised to produce a valuable security analysis.
What does it mean that 500 kilometers or more of tunnels—dubbed by the media as Hamas’s "Torahic immortality project"—have been constructed? What does the accumulation of thousands of tons of explosives mean? What does it mean to establish factories to produce tens of thousands of rockets? What does it mean to recruit tens of thousands of impoverished youth from refugee camps, pay millions of dollars monthly in salaries, in addition to scholarships, social assistance like marriage support, housing, and jobs, etc.?
What does it mean that thousands of hours of theoretical and practical training sessions, the last of which took place a month before October 7th, simulated the exact events of that day using the same methods employed in the attack along the borders? And what does it mean that surveillance cameras—among the most advanced and sensitive in the world—captured suspicious movements, even the day before the events? What does it mean that thousands traveled through the Rafah crossing and airports worldwide for training in Iran, Lebanon, Syria, Yemen, etc.? What does it mean that Hamas has stolen the scene from its rival, Islamic Jihad, after its victory for Jerusalem and Al-Aqsa on several occasions, while voices in the local and regional media space accused Hamas of cowardice?
What does it mean that millions of dollars flowed into Gaza from the coffers of Iran’s "immortality project" as if Iran were a charitable organization? What does it mean when settlers expand their control, burn villages, attack farmers, and continuously harass Al-Aqsa Mosque, accompanied by the assault and dragging of women by Israeli occupation police and the security apparatus of Ben-Gvir? What does it mean that dozens of protests in the West Bank pleaded for help from the symbolic trio of power—the Al-Qassam Brigades' leaders, including Deif, Sinwar, and Abu Ubaida?
What does it mean that the project of "Palestinian immortality" has fallen to the bottom of the United Nations’ agenda? What does Netanyahu’s boasting at the UN, presenting maps that negate not only the idea of a Palestinian state but the very existence of Palestinians, signify? And what of the dozens of public statements about "scorched earth" from both Israeli and Hamas leaders?
In this context, it’s crucial to ask how the Israeli security establishment, which found itself in a relaxed state of security near a powder keg of growing threats, could justify such confidence. They must have possessed concrete intelligence, which can only come from a deep technical and human infiltration—a prized asset, perhaps multiple sources, within the decision-making circles of the Hamas military wing, tested and verified many times, categorized under the highest security classification of “high confidence.”
After all, reports indicate that the Shin Bet head was woken up just hours before the attack due to intelligence about suspicious movements near the security fence. He went to his office, confirmed that everything appeared normal, and went back to sleep. This indicates a direct connection with a source within Hamas’s decision-making center, not merely one of its peripheral circles.
In this scenario, Israeli security fell prey to what is called “strategic deception,” misled for years following the Shalit deal, when there was an opportunity for a deep, misleading infiltration. The need of the targeted individual for relief from serving the rest of their sentence made them vulnerable. This explains why Islamic Jihad was left alone in multiple confrontations, why symbolic rocket attacks by Hamas were met with strikes on evacuated sites, and why Israel systematically targeted Islamic Jihad leaders while pausing assassinations of Hamas leaders.
Strategically deceived, Israel’s security relied on a non-updated target bank for its military response after October 7th. The tragic result was a reliance on blind, intense bombardment that led to massive civilian casualties in the first days of the war.
In the aftermath of Hamas’s significant blow to Israel on October 7th, facilitated by Iranian and regional allies, the psychological and political implications are far-reaching. For decades, Israel marketed itself as a master of security, yet within hours, the carefully crafted deterrence of seven decades shattered. This will inevitably reshape regional alliances and security strategies, necessitating political recalibration to accommodate the new realities.
The October 7th attack, planned according to the vision of Qassem Soleimani and executed with training in Iran, Yemen, and Lebanon, was no fluke. It was a calculated retaliation for Soleimani’s assassination, as confirmed by Iranian military leaders. However, the trust deficit among the factions and the chaos caused by the unorganized assault, including the surprise presence of thousands of festival-goers at the Nova music festival, led to operational confusion. This chaos also revealed Hamas’s miscalculation about Israel's response.
The plans, based on taking hundreds of hostages and prompting Iranian proxies to engage on multiple fronts, were undermined by the hardened psychological thinking of Israel’s leaders, who view this as a war of existence, not just a battle. Thus, in the fog of war, Hamas unknowingly committed a fatal strategic error, setting the stage for what may become an all-out Israeli campaign against its long-standing enemy, with the backing of a world sympathetic to Israel in the immediate aftermath of the attack. The international response, including the movement of U.S. and NATO carriers to the Mediterranean, signals that any challenge to Israel's security will face overwhelming force.
You can't help but feel like you’ve been struck by symptoms of paranoia as you hear and read about the "October 7th surprise." The simplest rules and skills of security analysis that any novice security analyst learns, allowing them to come up with a situation assessment, both general and immediate, put an end to this intellectual underestimation. In the language of security and the logic of analysis, it was essential to pause and reflect on many questions in order to produce a valuable security analysis.
What does it mean to have 500 kilometers or more of tunnels, which the media dubbed the “Hamas Metro” under the Torah’s immortality project? What does it mean to stockpile thousands of tons of explosives? What does it mean to set up factories to produce tens of thousands of rockets? What does it mean to recruit tens of thousands of the impoverished sons from refugee camps, paying millions of dollars in monthly salaries, not to mention internal and external scholarships, social assistance like marriage, housing, jobs, etc.? What does it mean to conduct thousands of hours of theoretical and practical training sessions, the last of which took place just a month before October 7th, simulating the exact events of October 7th with all the means used in the attack, directly on the borders, including testing how to disable and breach surveillance cameras? What does it mean when surveillance cameras—some of the most advanced and sensitive in the world—detect suspicious movements, even the day before the events?
What does it mean when thousands leave through the Rafah crossing and airports worldwide for training in Tehran, Lebanon, Syria, Yemen, etc.? What does it mean when Hamas wrests the spotlight from its fierce competitor, Islamic Jihad, who had defended Jerusalem and Al-Aqsa on several occasions, despite voices in the local and regional media accusing the Brotherhood's immortality project of failing to act? What does it mean when millions of dollars from the treasury of the Persian immortality project flow into Gaza, alongside similar amounts from Iran, which suddenly seems like a charity organization?
What does it mean when settlement activity escalates, with villages being burned, farmers attacked, and constant provocations against the most sacred sites (Al-Aqsa Mosque), accompanied by assaults and beatings of women by the occupation's police and the security forces of Ben-Gvir? What does it mean when dozens of protests erupt in the other part of the homeland, calling for protection from the trinity of power symbols—the guest, Sinwar, and Abu Ubaida, leaders of the Brotherhood's immortality project's military wing?
What does the ongoing normalization with the children of Ismail mean? And what does it mean when the Palestinian immortality project is pushed to the bottom of the United Nations' agenda? What does it mean when Netanyahu boasts on UN platforms, displaying maps that deny the very concept of a Palestinian state, even the existence of Palestinians themselves? What does it mean when there are dozens of public statements about burning everything green and dry, mirrored by the rhetoric of the Brotherhood's immortality project’s imams?
What does it mean when the Torah immortality project faced political and security chaos during the objections to judicial amendments, which led to unrest within the sacred military and reserve forces, and pilots, witnessed by the entire world? What does it mean when allies of the Torah immortality project withdraw worldwide to confront the Russian advance toward Europe through Ukraine?
With all of this happening under the rule of an arms-wielding leader in the Brotherhood's immortality state—a man afflicted with delusions of grandeur, dreaming of succeeding Yasser Arafat's legacy—Yahya Sinwar, who could not lead an organization of this size and complexity without further succumbing to madness. Sinwar had been released by Netanyahu, along with over a thousand others from the core of the Brotherhood's immortality brigades, in exchange for one soldier, Gilad Shalit. To save face, Netanyahu stipulated that the majority of the West Bank prisoners be relocated either to Gaza or abroad, knowing full well that Gaza and the outside world are connected by both public and secret means, with daily communication with the West Bank and efforts to rebuild the Brotherhood's immortality brigades there, pumping millions of dollars to create a significant presence!
And after all this, they reduced the military presence of the Torah immortality project in the Gaza periphery area, discarded the reports from the female soldiers monitoring the cameras into the trash, allowed thousands of workers from Gaza into the periphery settlements and inside Israel, areas deemed highly sensitive for security in the Gaza envelope. Even more bizarre, reports indicated that the female soldiers were left unarmed for personal protection, while soldiers and officers stationed in the area were granted regular leave during the most critical time of the year for the Torah immortality project, which they call Yom Kippur. This project had already been dealt a near-fatal blow in 1973, but U.S. intervention and its firm warning prevented its total collapse.
Security sciences teach us that Israeli security, which has been living in such a state of complacency, could not have been resting beside a powder keg filled with all these accumulated threats without knowing precisely, and without a shadow of a doubt, that the other side had no intent or capability to act. This confidence can only come from a deep technological and human penetration, representing a valuable asset—a direct line to one or more sources of information within the Brotherhood’s immortality brigades' decision-making circles. These sources had been tested multiple times, and their information had been classified as highly reliable.
As it stands now, after the Torah immortality project media outlets reported that the head of Shin Bet was awakened shortly before the start of the October 7th attack due to some suspicious movements near the security fence, which prompted him to go to his office, verify that everything was normal, and return to sleep, it is clear that a call was made with someone who is not only within the decision-making circles but at the very core of it. A false sense of security had been established.
The rest of the document delves further into the deception, mistakes in strategy, and political and military miscalculations leading up to the attack and aftermath.
Amid the scenes of devastation, a mixture of resistance and the ugliness of the actions carried out by the black-flag bearers—those trapped in the misery of the Brotherhood’s project of immortality and its partners, as well as the outlaws disregarding the calculations of the Immortality Brigades and the laws of war—the machinery of death, destruction, and savagery was unleashed for the Torah-based immortality project, fueled by an instinct for revenge and a lust for killing. This invoked all the demons of legend, starting with the annihilation of the descendants of Amalekites and the crushing of human animals, to calls for the use of weapons of mass destruction, cutting off water, electricity, fuel, food, and medicine, all in broad daylight—violations of both divine and earthly laws. The skies were filled with aircraft of all kinds, raining death and grinding both stone and flesh with walls of fire reminiscent of the horrors of Judgment Day.
Blood, the smell of gunpowder, and death engulfed the land of misery and suffering. One million people, over a third of the population, were forced to flee from the north to the south of the Valley of Death, following papers falling from the sky and urgent notifications on mobile phones. Half of the population sought safety, echoing the memories of their ancestors who had been forcibly displaced. The other half, unwilling to leave, resisted with the knowledge that their collective memory still bore the scars of past displacement. Meanwhile, the Brotherhood’s project fighters, armed and desperate, tried in vain to prevent the terrified masses from fleeing, but the survival instinct proved stronger than any resistance. Those fleeing were chased by the fires of death, accused of harboring armed fighters among the crowds, while twenty days of aerial bombardment continued unabated.
The assault did not relent, even after weeks of continuous strikes. Negotiations led to the release of over 100 elderly, women, minors, and flower-pickers, mostly from Thailand and other countries, in exchange for three times as many prisoners from the Torah-based project, with some distinguished by their higher "value" as legitimate sons of the Torah-based immortality project. Others, like the flower-pickers, were released without any value, seen as illegitimate sons. Both parties to the conflict used this exchange as a propaganda tool, showcasing their humanity, dignity, and morality, as if these hostages had willingly walked into the dungeons of the Brotherhood’s immortality project or, years earlier, the Bastilles of the Torah-based project, full of gratitude.
Yet the killing resumed, more brutally than before, targeting the northern, central, and southern areas of Gaza, sparing no place deemed "safe." Once again, papers were dropped from the sky, urging people to move to the farthest southern regions near Rafah, where more than a million people were crammed into less than 10% of Gaza’s space. Families huddled together in tents that neither shielded them from the summer’s heat nor the winter’s cold, filling hospital courtyards, streets, animal pens, chicken farms, cemeteries, and the shoreline, wherever their exhausted feet could take them. Despite these efforts, safety remained elusive, as only destroyed or incapacitated hospitals, schools, universities, places of worship, water desalination plants, and sewage treatment facilities remained.
What was left of Gaza was reduced to waste, with only ruins and disease left to accompany the surviving population.
Amidst a chaotic state of affairs, both in time and place, the one clinging to the last threads of legitimacy for a project of immortality, with its national and official divisions, witnesses Gaza being erased from the map of national existence and re-occupied. Shards of the once-called “Ikhwan’s State of Immortality” use Gaza and its human wreckage as shields to safeguard their remains. Meanwhile, there is a feverish, biblical search for new settlements or a revival of a village associations project, a new Khazandar, and other leaked projects intentionally released about a force from the sons of Ismail, custom-tailored according to biblical measures under international cover, with frantic international demands directed at the last remnants of Palestinian legitimacy. Outwardly, these demands appear reformist, but underneath, they aim to hand over the reins of actual power while retaining a symbolic role for the signing of a surrender document, raising white flags, and accepting crumbs that may or may not come.
Caught between the two extremes of the immortality projects stands the Arab system, alongside the few remaining leaders capable of merely speaking. They are divided among those trying to douse the flames raging at their borders while keeping an eye on their own miserable, hungry, and unstable interiors. Others remain focused on their Wahhabi sponsorship of the Ikhwan’s immortality project, which collapses before their eyes. Still, others continue to master the rhetoric of denunciation and condemnation, internally admitting that “the eye sees but the hand is short,” wishing they had borders with Gaza. Some even wish to erase the word "Muslim Brotherhood" from the Arabic lexicon, blaming them for allowing foreigners to take hold of the Arab nation. All of these actors calculate carefully for what they call the "day after the war" and its consequences, amidst a complete lack of vision.
Meanwhile, the public has long filled the cup of laments and its voices have stopped working, unable to form a rational mental picture of all that has occurred. They are lost between the shattering of a once-cherished dream and a future shrouded in the fog of misery and daily survival in a world plagued by the remnants of a great massacre still vividly present on the other side of the homeland.
In the U.S., the head of government feels choked by the leadership of the biblical state of immortality, unable to either swallow or expel it. From a strategic perspective, the biblical state is the most important ally in the Middle East, and its defeat will never be allowed, even if the U.S. must fight on its behalf. However, despite complete agreement with it on the need to eliminate the emerging threat at its doorstep, Washington sees the surrounding fires, which the leadership of the biblical state is not only failing to help extinguish but seeking to widen, potentially jeopardizing core American interests. This leaves direct U.S. intervention as the only option to resolve the conflict in its favor, even against its own preferred policy of containment.
At the same time, the king of biblical political manipulation, Benjamin Netanyahu, skilled in the art of political balancing, particularly within the U.S., attempts to replicate the game he played during Barack Obama’s era, defeating Hillary Clinton in the 2016 election to pave the way for Donald Trump’s return. But this time, the calculations of the threshing floor do not align with Netanyahu’s plans. As he packs his bags to face a new obstacle—Kamala Harris, the Democratic candidate after Joe Biden's withdrawal due to age-related factors—Netanyahu is confronted with a new challenge after Biden's failed debate and an assassination attempt on Trump.
As Netanyahu faces these challenges, American streets and universities, reflecting a changing America since the Obama era, erupt in protest against him, following his controversial visit to the U.S.
In the other part of the homeland, political gridlock reigns supreme, with leadership clinging to the reins of international legitimacy amid a sea of turbulent waves. One eye is on Gaza, where a bloody project seeks to liquidate the core of the Palestinian cause, while the other eye is on the West Bank, where the monster of settlement gnaws at its mountains and areas of urban expansion for the dream state. Meanwhile, there is an increase in those turning toward armed confrontation in the West Bank, with calls from Wahhabi-ruled land, just a stone's throw from major American bases like Al-Udeid and Al-Sailiya, echoing loudly. These calls are reinforced by Khaled Mashal, one of the prominent figures who returned to the scene after the void left by Ismail Haniyeh, openly advocating for a return to mass killings. His message to the leaders of the biblical eternity project is clear: go ahead with the destruction of the West Bank, the displacement of its people, and the obliteration of the remaining Palestinian presence, as if the death game in Gaza wasn’t enough to highlight the consequences of resistance funded by the eternal Persian project.
The Persian project, which knows no boundaries and uses all means available, is funding the purchase of loyalties and weapons stored in camps, but not in areas of contact with the settlement project. Under the eyes of the security apparatus of the biblical eternity project, this funding aims to bring down the Palestinian Authority, the last remnant of national legitimacy, which is a shared dream between the Persian eternity project, allied with the Muslim Brotherhood's eternity project, and the biblical eternity project. For the former, the Palestinian Authority is an obstacle to their plan, and its removal would open the door to chaos, allowing the Persian and Brotherhood projects to expand. For the latter, the fall of the Palestinian Authority would mark the end of the last legitimate representation of Palestinian existence, paving the way for Israel to claim that there is no partner for peace and to justify its actions under the guise of self-defense against resistance supported by the Persian eternity project.
Between the daily infiltration operations into these areas, large or small, and the widespread destruction of infrastructure and livelihoods, the power of the Palestinian Authority is severely undermined, as it is drawn into a hopeless confrontation that risks its very survival as the last symbol of national legitimacy. Meanwhile, Qatari analysts orchestrate the narrative, playing the tune of replicating the Gaza scenario in the West Bank, ignoring the fact that Gaza, despite its stockpiles of weaponry, could not withstand the killing machine and was utterly destroyed. Is the goal, then, to push the Palestinian Authority, which lacks the means for such a confrontation, into the same destructive path?
The aim is to involve the Palestinian Authority in the inevitable failure of the strategic ambitions of the Brotherhood's eternity project and the axis of resistance, dragging the Palestinian people into a devastating war that they cannot afford. This war has nothing to do with the Palestinian cause, as any rational analysis of the situation would confirm. However, the powers behind the resistance, along with their military and political analysts, repeat the same tired rhetoric, asking questions about the 75,000 armed personnel, while planting in the minds of the public the false notion that every person has a rifle at home. In reality, the weapons amount to no more than 10% of the total force, the majority of whom are involved in law enforcement, judicial, and customs duties, or are long-suffering veterans of the struggle against the biblical eternity project.
The pressure on the Palestinian Authority, orchestrated by both the Persian and Brotherhood eternity projects, aims to delegitimize the last standing symbol of national legitimacy.
One shell from Gaza, launched by the children of misery, is dedicated monthly to the project of eternal Brotherhood; a march from southern Lebanon every three months; and a march every six months from those who have turned against the state in happy Yemen. An incident of trampling, gunfire, knife attacks, or explosives carried by a person who has decided to die comes from the West Bank to the streets of Tel Aviv and Jerusalem, and the settlements of eternity that crowd the mountains and hills of the West Bank, which have just begun to escalate. Whenever it is possible for it to distract the army of eternal Torah and keep it standing on its feet for as long as the Lord wills, for years, and to keep the masses of its eternity in a cycle of conflict, blood, and tears, all temporary solutions will be of no avail in this case. Every effort to search for temporary solutions or to invent ideas, like looking for a trick to throw the burning fireball into the lap of those concerned, provided that it is not from the supporters of the project of the Palestinian state, whose first foundations were laid in the Frost Agreement.
Until the religious leaders and imams of the eternal projects, whose minds are stuffed with myths, are returned to their bottle of sorcery, and after all this chaos and nonsense with human blood and their future, it returns to the world’s agenda as the thirty-first anniversary of the signing of the Frost Agreement approaches. This agreement was not a surprising awakening for Yitzhak Rabin and Shimon Peres in a state of passion for the Palestinians; they were no less Zionist than Benjamin Netanyahu, Smotrich, and Ben Gvir. It was also not a sudden awakening for Yasser Arafat and Mahmoud Abbas in a state of passion for the Israelis; they were no less Palestinian than the guest, the Sanwar, and Haniyeh. However, the two sides of the Frost Agreement have tested the exorbitant cost of continuing in the whirlpool of conflict, blood, and tears. They tried not to be, as Bukrinski says, "humans eaten by nothingness," and chose to escape from the bonds of history and the eternal projects haunted by myths towards the space of "let us live and let others live," provided that freedom, human dignity, and justice are the umbrella for this coexistence, with no masters and no slaves, and no discrimination based on racial superiority for free descendants or the offspring of a maid, as they are all God's creations.
After more than thirty years since the Frost Agreement and all this bloody scene that followed due to the devils of humanity, is it not time for the language of logic and reason to be invoked in the age of artificial intelligence? Is it not time for a moment of review of everything that has happened after these two human groups and those around them have burned with their eternal projects? Or is the exchange of accusations and holding the other responsible for everything that has transpired, and absolving oneself of all that has happened still the dominant stance? And is the readiness for more blood and tears a form of heroism and a victory for the Lord?! And which Lord calls for the grinding and burning of humans, with no distinction between child, woman, elderly, and fighter? In many cases, the search teams for human bodies cannot sort the remains of humans from each other, and they resort to weighing human flesh to bury it, averaging seventy kilograms for adults and fifteen kilograms for minors, plus or minus; it means nothing in the wars of hatred and nihilism! And which Lord invites His creation to behead a helpless human with a shovel? All the horror scenes from the actions of the bearers of the black banner's ideology in the guise of death, including dragging the elderly, women, and children into the basements of death! Which Lord will accept your prayers and supplications while you are shoveling human bodies and digging up their eternal graves and delighting in the sufferings of naked humanity in the bastilles of the twenty-first century, begging a sick soul of one of them to place and operate a hose dedicated to extinguishing fires in the rear of one of the descendants of the giants, causing him suffering beyond human imagination? Or was not a single bullet, even if it were a criminal act according to the laws of heaven and earth, sufficient for that? The answer is no if black hatred and sadism are the masters of the moment!!
Worse still, when one of the Torah's eternal institutions, in its official capacity, comes to throw dust in the eyes of the world watching what is happening, you find hundreds of bearers of the Lord's message attempting to storm the places of detention of those who committed the crime to free them shamelessly or with any hint of humanity, even if it is false. They demand the unleashing of a collective rape of the descendants of giants from the wreckage of humanity in their bastilles! Which Lord will accept your prayers and supplications while you elevate misfits, rogues, and madmen as your leaders?! Which Lord will accept your prayers and supplications while you are two flocks of a people blinded by hatred, myths, and lies? And whoever emerges from among you to escape from your burning vessels is cursed, stoned, and vilified with the ugliest attributes!! What nation are you, seeing the misfits swimming on their bellies on filthy floors covered with the dirt carried by shoes at the gates of the other side's mosque, under the pretense of getting closer to the Lord, before the eyes of the greatest imbecile, who is in desperate need of a mental institution and is called the Minister of Security, intoxicated by what is happening?! What flock still believes in smuggling a small lamb in a cardboard box to slaughter it in the mosque’s yard, to burn its bones and scatter them in the wind, to get closer to the Lord, and to bring a genetically modified red heifer from Texas farms to match its myths?! What nation are you still entranced by a madman who took his people to this holocaust and hell, but rather elevates him, even in form, to place him at the top of the pyramid of myths for the project of eternal Muslim Brotherhood, the devils of the twentieth century, who have never placed their feet in any Arab land without it turning to ruin and destruction? Such a public will undoubtedly not bestow more misery than such a model!! What humans are you still closing your eyes to what has happened in Gaza and its people and want to drag the West Bank and its people into the same holocaust and nihilism?? Or after all this, do you still not know why the Lord has lifted the umbrella of His mercy from you, and He will not, nor has He, nor will He ever, grant victory to any of you, no matter how much you worship and pray, and no matter how much you kill in His name? For His curses have befallen you in advance, because you are, in short, a public misled by myths, worshipping outcasts, devils, and impostors, even if their garments change in the twenty-first century!
You are remnants of human wreckage, twisting the truths with lies. The curse of October seventh was neither the beginning of the story nor its end; there are many beginnings and curses over thousands of years, many non-endings, and between beginning and beginning, curse and curse, there will be a new beginning and another curse because the souls tainted by the poisons of myths will find no way to escape the confirmed truth except by twisting their necks with lies, as if the world, no matter how short its memory or hiding behind its finger, does not see or hear about momentous events and scenes that provoke stones before humans. Their images are captured by the cameras of the whole world, not from tens of years ago, but shortly before the curse of October seventh, which they called the dances of flags at the gates of the holiest sanctuaries for the other side, led by the crazies Ben Gvir and Smotrich, ministers of the government of eternal Torah in a region known in international law as occupied territories, with all the violence, beating, cursing, and violation of the sanctity of holy places, which in the traditions and beliefs of the public of the other side equals death. Indeed, for them, death would be a small price to pay before seeing it with their own eyes.
In light of this scene, which revealed the ugliest in humans, it has become the duty of the civilized world, which has escaped from myths decades ago into the expanses of reality, to understand, without leaving any room for doubt, that the crazies among the public of eternity on both sides of the conflict are the ones who control the scene with all their ugliness in an escalating manner. It has become impossible for those remaining among the leaders of the eternal projects to reach any solutions on their own, no matter how much they escape from the grip of myths after all these torrents of blood, suffering, and anxieties, and the exchange of blame for a past that has elapsed, and a current responsibility for what is happening. The urgent need has arisen to search for a solution outside the box of myths and illusions. The ongoing zero-sum wars, existential and nihilistic, based on the struggle of ethnic and religious eternal projects must be untangled by thinkers, not politicians. For five neutral thinkers, tasked and mandated by a binding decision from the Security Council, are capable of reviewing all agreements, decisions, and international texts, both old and new, to come up with recommendations and outline final solutions to this conflict within six months, to be adopted in all its details by a decision issued by the United Nations Security Council under Chapter VII, sending international forces to disengage and monitor the implementation of these texts. Thus, the free world clears its conscience if it genuinely wishes to stop the bloodshed of the upcoming victims without hesitation or delay, withdrawing the legitimacy of a party granted its existence by decisions issued by the United Nations, to offer crumbs of time to another because the alternative will be, sooner rather than later, a frantic search for means of collective annihilation for this region and its inhabitants. This is not mere fantasy if the devils of myths and outcasts are left enough space to wreak havoc on earth.
End
تعليقات
إرسال تعليق